There were four ALJ determinations posted on August 17, 2023. All were pre-hearing process determinations. How does one make interesting the analysis of three process dismissals and a timy dismissal? Try writing them up as haiku! For those unfamiliar with the format, haiku are brief poems in three lines and seventeen syllables. The first and third lines of a haiku are five syllables, and the middle line is seven syllables. They are intended to express, in elegant brevity, the essence of something the writer observed. History will, no doubt, judge me harshly for attempting to apply the haiku structure to TiNY case summaries.
Matter of Abdulmalik, Supervising ALJ (SALJ) Gardiner, August 10, 2023; Div’s Rep. Peter Ostwald, Esq.; Pet’s Rep. pro se; Article 22.
Petition unsigned.
Post-warning, problem not fixed.
Judge dismissed the case.
Matter of Malone, SALJ Gardiner, August 10, 2023; Div’s Rep. Laura Krzeminski, Esq.; Pet’s Rep. pro se; Articles 28 and 29.
Same as the first case:
There is no jurisdiction
If no signature.
Matter of SMWF, LLC, SALJ Gardiner, August 10, 2023; Div’s Rep. Aliza Chase, Esq.; Pet’s Rep. pro se; Articles 28 and 29.
This time no notice
Was attached to petition.
Dismissal ensued.
Matter of Bit of Bengal, Inc., ALJ Law, August 10, 2023; Div’s Rep. Brandon Batch, Esq.; Pet’s Rep. James Lam, CPA; Articles 28 and 29.
Division’s proof shows
Conference request too late.
Typical timy.
